What Compliance Teams Are Carrying
Compliance rarely fails on policy. It fails on the operational work underneath it.
Evidence for an audit is reconstructed after the fact instead of captured as it happens
Regulatory changes mean rewriting a process that was never written down
Compliance requirements change faster than teams’ continuing education can keep up
Screening results get reviewed in a spreadsheet with no record of who cleared what
Onboarding stalls because verification steps run in sequence instead of parallel
Tooling That Produces Its Own Evidence
KYC & Onboarding
Verification workflows that move in parallel, escalate cleanly, and record every decision with the reasoning attached.
AML, PEP & Sanctions
Screening and alert review built around the analyst's day, with tuning you can adjust as risk appetite changes.
GDPR & Data Protection
Data handling, retention, and subject request workflows implemented so the audit trail is a byproduct of normal work.
Automation in regulated workflows earns scope slowly. We start narrow, keep a human in the loop where it matters, measure false positives and analyst time, and expand only after the numbers hold.
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS+−
Which compliance areas does Progentic AI cover?
KYC and onboarding; AML, PEP, and sanctions screening; and GDPR and data protection, with case management and audit reporting across every area.
How is the audit trail created?
Every decision is recorded with the reasoning attached, so the audit trail is a byproduct of normal work instead of something reconstructed after the fact.
Is there a human in the loop?
Yes. We start narrow, keep a human in the loop where it matters, measure false positives and analyst time, and expand only after the numbers hold.
Can screening be tuned to our risk appetite?
Yes. Screening and alert review are built around the analyst's day, with tuning you can adjust as risk appetite changes.